Newsletter Logo
 
An electronic Newsletter
to help you market your school,
community college, college,
or university.
June 2006
 

The Impossible Dream

by Bob Topor, Senior Consultant

 

The recent report of America's Best Colleges and Universities" by US News And World Report reminds us that the struggle to quantify and report the impossible dream of ranking higher educational institutions again clouds the educational landscape.

This has been a problem plaguing higher education for decades, ever since the first "comparisons" found their way to the popular newsstands.

The problem of applying equitable criteria to abstract ideas like higher
education are vast. Very few techniques have been developed to do this in a fair, equitable and honest manner. Much current data is skewed by
techniques and "targets" for information gathering. Admissions, PR
officers, Deans and Presidents are not the best folks to evaluate fairly.
Many results are skewed by overly zealous "fact" providers.

What is the answer to this dilemma?

It may be simpler and more apparent than we suspect!

Why not evaluate higher education efforts by the results? Why not establish a methodology to assess incoming Freshmen, establish benchmarks and then evaluate graduates as they go on to apply their new findings? By the results they shall be known!

By tracking individual development and progress (much as with grades) we can track and compare educational results. I asked my colleague, Dr. Moshe Engelberg, (Ph.D., Stanford) President of ResearchWorks in San Diego, for his reaction to this idea. He said "It might get kids and their parents to think in advance- why am I going to college? What do I want to achieve? And so on. Another world changing Bob idea!"

An article in the New York Times, "No Undergraduate Left Behind" suggested "a plea for accountability in higher education. " In it, the author, Eugene Hickok, writes "it is time for colleges to develop accurate measures of student achievement, and of the value institutions of higher education provide."

Let's use careers, advanced degrees and professional accomplishments as ways to evaluate "quality." This would provide much fairer conclusions about individual institutional effectiveness.

Many people have worked hard, over the decades, to improve higher
education. I want to see us succeed and maintain our position in the world.

I think this approach would help.

What do you think? E-mail me.

© 2006 Topor Consulting Group International, Robert S. Topor


NOTICE:

As a subscriber to this electronic newsletter, you have permission to reproduce and use this article on your campus.
All others please note ©2006, Topor Consulting Group International.
Comments about, or requests to reprint should be directed to Bob Topor at: topor@marketinged.com.


Robert Stanley Topor
Marketing Higher Education Consultant,
Author, Lecturer, Publisher (Educational Catalyst books)
Retired, Stanford University

Topor Consulting Group International

282 Nevada Street
Redwood City, CA 94062-2136
e-mail: topor@marketinged.com

Marketing Higher Education e-newsletter
(see web site)

Marketing Higher Education web site: http://www.marketinged.com
voice: 650 364.9551
cel: 650.224.0692
fax: 650.364.617

TOP


Marketing Higher Education Newsletter is published by:
Topor Consulting Group International